Download PDF Once, A God of No Consequence

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Once, A God of No Consequence file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Once, A God of No Consequence book. Happy reading Once, A God of No Consequence Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Once, A God of No Consequence at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Once, A God of No Consequence Pocket Guide.
Why Does the Bible Stress the Power of Jesus’s Name?
  1. 1. In the Garden, God speaks
  2. Practical Consequences of Believing in the Trinity
  3. What Did God Do after Adam and Eve Sinned?
  4. Why does God let bad things happen? | Institute in Basic Life Principles

Agnostics, we know, are wont to protest very strongly against the designation of atheists being applied to them, and the protest, whether reasonable or not, proves at least this much, that in their estimation the intellectual position of one who should claim to have demonstrated the non-existence of God is altogether irrational. Under these circumstances it is not necessary to consider the practical consequences of Dogmatic Atheism, but only those of Agnosticism.

1. In the Garden, God speaks

This we call Sceptical Atheism, since the name is one that is founded on truth and required by symmetry. The objection that may be raised to it by agnostics may become less if they will observe that the name atheist taken by itself has been defined to mean one who acts as if there were no God. Agnostics can hardly deny that they do this. We assert then, in the present thesis, that the logical consequences of sceptical atheism in the practical order are so opposed to reason as to involve a condemnation of its tenets. There are pessimists in the world, and their number is said to be increasing with the spread of "modern thought.

It is rather addressed to those who cannot think that Nature is a fraud or a pest, but believe its course to be stamped with the promise of a true hope. In proof of our thesis, we will first invite attention to the moral paradox in which the agnostic finds himself entangled, or rather would find himself entangled if only he would reflect sufficiently. Few agnostics would deny that, if the Christian assumption were correct and the existence of such a God as Christians believe in were an ascertained truth, it would follow at once that He must desire the worship of loving reverence.

Just as it is inconceivable that, if two persons hold towards each other the physical relationship of father and son, the father should not desire to enter into the moral relationship of intercourse with his son and have it reciprocated by loving and reverent affection and obedience, so also, if there is a personal God from whom man, has received his being, faculties, and all else that he can call his, it is inconceivable that God should not desire to enter into moral relationship with him and receive a loving and obedient service and worship. The conception of a God who, at some past moment, made the world, set it spinning like a top, and then ceased to care about it, has always been rejected by the larger part of civilized nations, and at the present day has fallen into discredit.

If, therefore, God desires this worship, man ought to render it, and in the case of his not rendering it, the requirements of natural equity are violated and an indignity is offered to God.

  1. Film Review: God's Not Dead 2 | Consequence of Sound!
  2. Oliver the Cat and His Adventures;
  3. What Is Sexual Immorality? Discover Its Meaning and Consequences from the Bible.
  4. The Dissection of Vertebrates.

So much as this will be generally conceded to us by agnostics. They do not challenge the inference as to conduct and worship which Christians draw from Christian premisses. They only challenge the premisses, that is, the certainty of the existence of God. They do not go so far as positively to deny the existence of God. They merely contend that it is uncertain. But in declaring it to be uncertain most of them go farther, and admit with Darwin that it is more probable than the opposite opinion.

That is to say, it is probable that there exists a God desirous of receiving love and worship from His creatures, and therefore reciprocally probable that it is man's sacred duty to render it to Him. This the agnostic, by the very fact that he protests against being called an atheist, is bound to admit, and yet because he professes himself unable to go farther and convert the probability into a certainty, he cannot render the worship.

Practical Consequences of Believing in the Trinity

Such is the moral paradox to which the agnostic is reduced. And the paradox will be felt the greater if the agnostic will observe that, on his own principles, the hypothesis of the existence of an intelligent ruler of the world is not only probable, but even the most probable theory to account for the facts. When he forgets his philosophy, and as a man of science, that is, of physical science, adopts the attitude of the pure realist, he professes himself agnostic on the ground that Evolution in its extremest form may account for that order reigning through Nature which is the theist's foundation-stone.

Now, Evolution thus conceived, however it may be dressed up in modern fashions, is in essence nothing but the old theory of the fortuitous concourse of atoms: the theory that, given eternal atoms and eternal motion, eventually order will result from their interaction, since order is self-sustaining and chaos is not. Can it possibly be claimed as relatively probable, or anything but relatively most improbable when set in competition with the rival theory of a personal Designer?

If the agnostic puts on his philosophic cloak and becomes a transfigured realist with Mr.

Spencer, the existence of an "Infinite" is admitted, and all denied is the lawfulness, in face of the relativity of knowledge, of attributing to the Unknown Cause of the universe any attributes derived from the consideration of the things of this world, man not excluded. The protest made against the practice of assigning them to Him is made on the ground that they are likely to be altogether beneath Him: that is to say -- if logically explained -- on the likelihood that He may possess attributes which may go so far beyond even the most noble qualities of the human mind, that the latter are nothing but a dim and comparatively insignificant image of a First Mind, and that human personality is but a dim and comparatively insignificant image of the Personality of the First Cause.

In other words, that the great "Unknowable" is supereminently a person. If the agnostic declines to be in any sense a realist, and shuts himself up in some form of pure idealism, we will not attempt to press him with the statement of the present thesis. The idealist is guilty of inconsistency in his every act of intercourse with the outer world.

What Did God Do after Adam and Eve Sinned?

With such a burden of inconsistencies upon him, and all so easily borne, we cannot expect him to shrink from one more. But we may say this, that for realists the hypothesis of the existence of a personal God ought to count as the most probable of the theories in the field, and thus the moral paradox which has been described as arising out of the agnostic position becomes the more acute. Such is the logical consequence of agnosticism as regards the duties more properly called religious.

Its logical effects on the observance of the moral law in general are also fatal. We maintain that in the great mass of mankind, were agnosticism ever universally accepted, its effects, moral and social, would be most pernicious. Individuals of the average human type cannot lose the belief in an all-seeing and infinitely holy and just God without being exposed to commit many crimes, which they would not have committed if they had persevered in that belief.

If God does not exist, no one is able to point out any sufficient principle of morality, which he can prove that man is absolutely bound to abide by. Do not be offended by the Word of God or critical of those preaching it. God wants to build your faith, so embrace the challenges and believe that God will pull you through them.

God blesses us when we have the right attitude and make the right choices, but he is offended when we do not. And how long will it be ere before they believe me. We too often forget all the blessings in our life when we face problems that seem unconquerable.

Why does God let bad things happen? | Institute in Basic Life Principles

Time and time again, God proved His reliability to the Hebrew nation. God is just and has the full intention of fulfilling all of His promises. However, God did spare the nation of Israel and showed them mercy. In Proverbs, it says that God chastens those He loves and scourges His children.

Is this not relevant to our country today in ? Are we not as a sovereign nation uniquely in our history, openly dependent upon God as our Creator and the Bible as our guide? A majority, if not all of our founding fathers, were members of Bible preaching churches and attended services weekly. It has only been within my lifetime that prayer and Bible reading were not part of the curriculum in our public schools.

They reared the fabrics of a government, which has no model on the face of the globe. The communication between God and Moses brought mercy upon Israel, but there were still consequences. No person of the age of accountability set foot in the Promised Land, except for Joshua and Caleb. The ten fearful spies died in the pestilence. God was still good and took care of them during their endless cycle of wandering in the wilderness.

God showed mercy because of men of faith like Caleb, Joshua, and Moses.

We need men of that caliber to have faith for God to do the same for America. We need people that will pray to God as Moses did. Israel was rescued by the prayer of one man. Do not think that you are irrelevant! Moses used a fascinating argument with God in Number , to defend the Israelites. He reminds God that they are His people and other nations know of how great and mighty is their God. He then reminds God of what the other nations will think and say when they see that God has abandoned his own people. God has raised America up to be the greatest nation on the earth and he certainly can sustain us if we stand up and prove ourselves faithful in prayer for our nation.

If Sodom and Gomorrah had ten righteous men, then God would not have destroyed that city. I see our country today with many Christ-honoring people. We need to do everything we can to preserve our country.

2. Our salvation is an expression of God’s love.

We must look to the future considering what kind of a land we want our children and grandchildren to live in. God is jealous of His reputation!